|
ssdi and fibromyalgia
|
|
|
|
My client also complained of episodes of mental confusion (these look like episodes of “fibro fog” to me). In January, 2007, my client took a leave of absence in an effort to regain her heath. She saw many different physicians, all of whom recognized that she had a mild orthopedic condition that was not surgical in nature and that did not explain her extreme pain and fatigue. During 2007 and 2008, my client was diagnosed with a number of conditions, including:
This case was a little unusual in that I did not have any one doctor to “put everything together.” My client saw two neurologists, neither of whom appear to recognize fibromyalgia as a disabling condition. One neurologist noted that the claimant’s condition was not surgical in nature and that she had “multiple somatic complaints and was quite anxious and distraught,” and a second neurologist noted that my client’s MRI was “unimpressive” and that “I do not feel that she is permanently disabled at this time.” The second neurologist refused to complete a functional capacity form at my request. I was able to get my client’s family doctor to fill out a form in which he said that her primary diagnosis is “myalgia” with a secondary diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy, degenerative joint disease and polyarthritis. The family doctor did assign activity limitations that would result in vocational witness testimony of “no jobs.” The Hearing: this case was scheduled to be heard by a judge in the Atlanta downtown hearing office who does not rely on vocational witness testimony and who makes quick decisions during the hearing. I have found him to be receptive to well reasoned pre-hearing arguments, so I drafted and submitted a pre-hearing brief in this case. You can read a redacted copy of my brief by clicking on the link. When my client and I arrived at the hearing room, the judge went through preliminary matters quickly then he noted that I had filed a pre-hearing brief. He announced that based on the argument presented in the brief as well as his review of the record, he was going to approve benefits in this case. My client did not end up having to present any testimony at all. Analysis: this was a somewhat unusual case that I am classifying as a “fibromyalgia” claim because my client’s symptoms of pain, mental confusion, digestive distress and symptoms of pain that move around her body are much more consistent with a fibromyalgia diagnosis than the patchwork diagnoses that she has received over the years. I think that her family doctor has it right, while the neurologists she saw are missing the big picture. In any case, the judge was open to my argument that whatever you call my client’s condition, her symptoms are debilitating. Clearly her long work history was a helpful factor here as was her consistency in seeking treatment.
|
| [Main Page] [Frequently Asked Questions] [About Ginsberg Law] [Contact Ginsberg Law] [Download Center] [Case Studies & Strategies] |
|
Copyright 2007-2010 Ginsberg Law Offices, P.C., 1854 Independence Square, Atlanta, GA 30338. 770-393-4985 All rights reserved.
|